Reaction Web

Search REACTION projects Search REACTION projects

Map REACTION projects Map REACTION projects


Judgedments

VIII. EXPERT JUDGEMENT

1. Expert contact (person who fills the expert judgement):
Expert Contact same as Project Contact? No
Expert Contact same as Data Contact? No
If expert contact is different from Data and Project contact, please indicate: 
Last Name: Fabião  First Name: António 
Organisation: Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal  Job Title: Professor, Silviculture 
Street Address: Tapada da Ajuda  City:  Lisboa 
State:  Estremadura  Postal code: 1349-017 Lisboa 
Phone: +351 213 653 488  Fax number: +351 213 645 000 
Email:  afabiao@isa.utl.pt  Web page Address:  www.isa.utl.pt 
Relationship with the project: 
- Design
- Implementation
- Management of project area
YES Research
- Other (describe):  

2. According to site conditions and degradation impacts, were the objectives appropriate and well-chosen?
Yes
Explain briefly: This is an area of low productivity slopes and hilltops, where the traditional cereal culture leaded the soil to high degradation levels 

3. According to site conditions and degradation impacts, were the methods (site preparation, species selection, prior actions,...) appropiate and well-chosen?
Yes
Explain briefly: Site preparation and the choice of tree species were adequate 

4. Do ecological health and integrity appear to be improved, enhanced?
Yes
Explain briefly: Soil cover was strongly improved and the autochthonous shrub species diversity seems to have improved; Also, in unit 2, the previous tree cover was destroyed by a wildfire  

5. Does the general ecological trajectory appear dynamic?
Yes
Explain briefly: Soil carachteristics and natural vegetation diversity were improved (unit 1); The non-disturbed areas of understory vegetation are apparently in an intermediate successional stage (unit 2) 

6. Any signs of threshold crossings?
No
Explain briefly:  

7. Consequences of the restoration project on the soil (physical properties, biological activities, functions,...):
Meteorization of parent material and literfall accumulation were the main factors for soil improvement 

8. Consequences on ecosystem structure, including forest cover, horizontal layers, etc. :
1) Forest cover was increased from a situation of scarce and disperse tree cover; 2) Landscape diversity was improved through the expansion of forested patches; 3) Re-establishment of forest cover after fire increased landscape diversity 

9. Consequences on ecosystem functions : productivity, dissemination, etc. :
Functions related to soil formation, soil organic matter content and plant species diversity were positively affected 

10. Actions needed and next monitoring actions to be considered. Please explain in your own words and indicate your recommendations, e.g., for
a.- Research/Development: Control of invasive Acacia spp. around the project area; Tree pruning should be enlarged within stand (unit 2) 
b.- Demonstration, communication and education: Development and maintenance of the recreational skills within the project area 
c.- Public policy:  
d.- Other:   

REACTION: This research is supported by the "Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development" programme, under contract EVK2-2002-80025