|
| 2. According to site conditions and degradation impacts, were the objectives appropriate and
well-chosen? |
| Yes |
| Explain briefly: |
The floods of the city of Thessaloniki disappeared and the whole landscape has improved. |
|
| 3. According to site conditions and degradation impacts, were the methods (site preparation, species selection, prior actions,...) appropiate and
well-chosen? |
| Yes |
| Explain briefly: |
But not completely, there was not at all site preparation. |
|
| 4. Do ecological health and integrity appear to be improved, enhanced? |
| Yes |
| Explain briefly: |
|
|
| 5. Does the general ecological trajectory appear dynamic? |
| Yes |
| Explain briefly: |
The understorey with sprouting evergreens is coming from place to place according to site conditions. |
|
| 6. Any signs of threshold crossings? |
| No |
| Explain briefly: |
|
|
| 7. Consequences of the restoration project on the soil (physical properties, biological activities,
functions,...): |
| The soil properties, especially the physical and biological, have improved because the organic matter increased. |
|
| 8. Consequences on ecosystem structure,
including forest cover, horizontal layers, etc. : |
| The whole ecosystem has improved structurally (horizontally and vertically) as well as in diversity. New populations of plants and animals have appeared. |
|
| 9. Consequences on ecosystem functions : productivity, dissemination, etc.
: |
| The ecosystem's functions have improved, since the restoration of the forest has improved the microclimate of the site (endo-forest environment). |
|
| 10. Actions needed and next monitoring actions to be considered. Please explain in your own words and indicate your recommendations, e.g.,
for |
| a.- Research/Development: |
In order to get much more precise knowledge |
| b.- Demonstration, communication and education: |
In order to make more sensible |
| c.- Public policy: |
|
| d.- Other: |
|
