|
|
|
|
V. ASSESSMENT BY RESTORATION UNITS
|
V.2. STRUCTURE & BIODIVERSITY
|
|
1. Stand/unit age: |
|
- |
Old |
|
 |
Mature |
|
- |
Young |
|
| 2. Tree canopy structure: |
|
- |
Multi-layered |
|
|
Mono-layered |
|
- |
Absence of tree layer |
|
| 3. Understorey: |
|
- |
Varied and multi-layered |
|
|
Herbaceous layer and scatter woody plants |
|
- |
Absent |
|
- |
Other. Describe: |
|
|
| 4. Spatial distribution of trees: |
|
- |
Regular |
|
- |
Slightly clumped |
|
- |
Patches and gaps |
|
| 5. How natural is the composition of tree species? |
|
|
Fully |
|
- |
Partly |
|
- |
Exotic |
|
|
6. How natural is the composition of other species? |
|
|
Fully |
|
- |
Partly |
|
- |
Exotic |
|
| 7. List the alien species present, if any: |
| |
|
| 8. Cover of sprouter species: |
| Total: |
10 |
| Tree species: |
0 |
| Shrub species: |
10 |
|
9. Biological inventories:
Please list species inventoried and indicate number of species by taxa, if available |
| Taxa |
a) Before the project. |
b) After the project. |
| Reference date: |
|
Reference date: |
|
| Flora |
| Inventory: |
| Pinus halepensis, Juniperus Oxycedrus, Juniperus Phoenicea, Quercus coccifera, Quercus ilex, Crataegus oxycantha, Ulex australia, Pistacia lentiscus, Pistacia terebinthus, Cistus libanotis, Helianthemun comun, Rosmarinus officinalis, Thymus silvestris, Satuseja montana, Marrubium vulgaris, Hissopus offiicinalis, Artemisa glutinosa, Helichrysum stoechas,Daphne gnidium, Brachipodium retusum, Cynodon dactylon, Stipa tenaccissima |
| Dominant species: |
| |
Rare / Endangered /
Threatened / Protected: |
| |
| Total number of species inventoried: |
| |
|
| Inventory: |
| Astragalus sp., Brachypodium phoenicoides, Brachypodium retusum, Cistus albidus, Cistus clusii, Dorycnium rectum, Fumana ericoides, Fumana thymifolia, Genista scorpius, Helianthemum lavandulifolia, Helianthemum squamatum, Juniperus oxycedrus, Leguminosa sp., Linum sufruticosum, Pinus halepensis, Quercus coccifera, Rossmarinus officinalis,Stipa parviflora, Stipa tenacissima, Teucrium capitatum, Thymus vulgariss;
|
| Dominant species: |
| |
Rare / Endangered /
Threatened / Protected: |
| |
| Total number of species inventoried: |
| |
|
| Fauna |
|
|
| Others |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Absence of keystone or dominant species that would be expected: |
|
|
Yes |
|
- |
No |
|
- |
Unknown |
| If yes, please list: |
Quercus ilex |
|
| 11. Are any functional groups (shrub layer, annual legumes, perennial grasses, etc.) missing or endangered? |
|
- |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
- |
Unknown |
| If yes, please list: |
|
|
| 12. Presence of key species indicative of ecosystems at particular succesional stage: |
|
- |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
- |
Unknown |
| If yes, please list: |
|
|
| 13. Presence of key species indicative of integrity of food webs: |
|
- |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
- |
Unknown |
| If yes, please list: |
|
|
| 14. Are there any genetic data available: |
|
- |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
- |
Unknown |
| If yes, please list: |
|
|
|
